
Listen to more stories on the Noa app.
It was a strange weekend for employees of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to say the least. On Friday, hundreds of workers at the agency, many of whom have been furloughed since the federal government shut down on October 1, found out they were being fired as part of widespread layoffs across federal agencies. Less than a day later, a curt follow-up email landed in many of their inboxes informing them that they werenât being let go after all. No explanation, no apology.
Staffers spent the weekend trading calls and texts, trying to piece together who had been axed, who had been spared, and, most puzzling, why. âThereâs really no strategy that theyâre using, no real approachâat least any thoughtful approachâto how they are doing these cuts,â Daniel Jernigan, who directed the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases before he resigned in August, told me.
I spoke with half a dozen current and former CDC officials, and foremost on their mind was what they described as the ineptitude of the botched downsizing. For example, almost all editors of the âMorbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,â which the CDC has published since 1960, were among those notified on Friday night that their work was âunnecessary or virtually identical to duties being performed elsewhere in the agency.â By Saturday, several CDC sources told me, they had their jobs back.
Andrew Nixon, the communications director for Health and Human Services, wrote in an email that âthe employees who received incorrect notifications were never separated from the agency and have all been notified that they are not subject to the reduction in force.â He declined to answer specific questions about layoffs.
Many of the cuts that have stuck so far seem to conflict with the administrationâs stated aims. A branch of the National Center for Health Statistics that coordinates an annual survey of the dietary habits of Americansâa topic presumably of interest to those attempting to make America healthy againâwas eliminated, according to its former chief, David Woodwell. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has accused the agencyâs vaccine advisory board of being âplagued with persistent conflicts of interestâ and insisted that such conflicts must be eliminated in order to restore Americansâ trust in the CDC. And yet, the agencyâs human-resources officeâwhich handled ethics issuesâhas been scrapped, according to Alt CDC, a team of anonymous public-health officials that has been crowdsourcing updates on the firings. âI would think, if you are monitoring for conflicts of interest, particularly when youâve accused the agency of having them, you would want to have an office to do that,â Debra Houry, who was the CDCâs chief medical officer until she resigned in August, told me.
One veteran researcher who still has his job (and, like other public-health workers I spoke with for this story, requested anonymity for fear of losing it) told me he believes that Kennedyâs ultimate goal is to âsilence the scientific voice of career CDC scientists.â And indeed, perhaps the clearest result of the firings is that they appear to consolidate Kennedyâs power over the agency. Every member of the CDCâs Washington office, which serves as a conduit between the agencyâs Atlanta headquarters and Capitol Hill, was fired; barring a second round of reversals, that office appears to be closed. The person managing Alt CDCâs Bluesky feed yesterday, who identified herself as an epidemiologist in a state health department, told me sheâd heard that CDC personnel who normally share information with state officials during outbreaks have been eliminated. âSo the only contact they have is going to HHSâis going to RFK,â the epidemiologist told me.
For CDC scientists who received layoff notices, the past few days have been disorienting. I spoke with one longtime scientist at the agency who learned on Friday that she would lose her job but then, on Saturday, received an email with the subject line âRescission of Previous Notice of Reduction in Force.â In other words, her jobâdeemed redundant the day beforeâwas again apparently necessary. She told me that her short-lived firing âfelt like the culmination of eight months of abuseâ under the Trump administration. She was particularly distressed by Kennedyâs June decision to fire the entire vaccine advisory board and stack it with his allies, but recent months have offered even more opportunities for stress and indignation. In August, a gunman who blamed COVID vaccines for his depression opened fire on the agencyâs Atlanta campus, killing a police officer. (The veteran scientist told me she shopped online for a bulletproof vest to wear to work, though she ended up not buying one.) Weeks later, Kennedy pushed out the agencyâs newly confirmed director, Susan Monarez. Three top CDC officialsâHoury, Jernigan, and Demetre Daskalakis, the former director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseasesâsubsequently resigned in protest.
Read: âIt feels like the CDC is overâ
On Friday, hours before layoff notices went out, Jim OâNeill, who took over as acting CDC director after Monarezâs ouster, posted two photos on X of what appeared to be a bald eagle soaring over the Capitol building. His message: âGood morning we are going to win.â For the people I spoke with who remain at the CDC, what exactly the acting director hopes to winâand for whomâisnât clear, in part because they havenât heard anything else from OâNeill. On Friday, instead of discussing the growing turmoil at the agency he oversees, Kennedy posted on X congratulating President Donald Trump for his new drug-pricing deal and defending comments he made at a recent Cabinet meeting linking autism with the use of Tylenol after circumcision. As of this evening, he still hadnât addressed the firing about-face.